Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She identifies e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that we should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The author also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers certainly are a harmless option to smoking, if used correctly.
Almost all of the data on smoking and its own risks comes from adults, and this helps it be hard to assess how the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths every year are due to smoking. This figure is likely an underestimation, because so Juul Compatible Pods many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t intend to do so.
The writer suggests that we should consider the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, even though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that folks who utilize the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that comes from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is critical to remember that smoking cigarettes and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to have the same effect as smoking cigarettes, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing provides a highly similar experience as smoking cigarettes. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. It also means that they are taking steps in the direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a healthier lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of carbon monoxide smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies must not be permitted to advertise their products as safe when all they will have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the unwanted effects of increased levels of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports concerning the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers attempting to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a key point in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last couple of years.
The writer does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking through a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health effects of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually reverse to cigarette smoking. He appears to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes is to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who try to quit often do so due to other health issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are various reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes do not contain any real tobacco, some of the chemicals found in cigarette smoking are located in the smokes. The author seems to be of the fact that all we need to do to solve the issue of smoking is to decrease the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not located in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing how much chemicals we take in improves anything other than our health and wellness. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain any of the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.